Who To Block, and Whether, and When

Saturday night, I made clear my shock and disgust at the verdict in the trial of George Zimmerman for the killing of Trayvon Martin. I did this on Facebook. As expected, I got a lot of response. Some people disagreed with me. I found some of their arguments to be well-reasoned, although wrong in my view. Others I found to be maddening, provoking, taunting, backwards and scary. In my anger, I was tempted to unfriend or block people who expressed the latter type of opinion.

I didn’t. Well, I did block one guy for about two minutes, but then I unblocked him. And his post was probably the most repugnant I read.

I’m not going to argue the merits or deficiencies of my opinion that the Zimmerman case resulted in an enormous injustice. I don’t want to waste your time debating a point about which — well, let’s just say I can’t imagine a set of circumstances that would make me change my mind about this. If anyone has such a set, contact me. I will listen.FB_Screen

Besides, that’s not the point here. The question is, in the age of the biggest conversation pit/chalkboard/idea dodgeball game in history, a computer mammoth whose very name has become a noun, verb, and adjective as common in speech as “the,” what do we do about dissenters who are so horribly wrong that their position strains credulity? People with whom our disagreement is so deep that we might not want to even be in their presence?

Keep them in your feed, that’s what.

Facebook is a collection of walled villages. It’s like driving through Plano, Texas, or a thousand other American suburbs: acres and acres of gated communities, each with its own swinging electric fence opening only to the right password. You can very easily engineer your Facebook account so that everyone is just like you — thinks like you, dresses like you, speaks like you, on and on. And some people do, which is fine if that’s what they want.

But those who also want to use Facebook’s powerful forum for the free exchange of ideas should think long and hard about exclusion. How intellectually honest can your positions be if you effectively banished dissent? Disagreement is a kind of mental cross-examination; it makes us put up or shut up. We must use it to test our concepts, and if they fail, we must be adults and change our thinking. If they do not fail, we must have the courage of a well-constructed conviction.

Noble, right? Well, as we all know, it’s hard to feel noble when some dumbass essentially ignores the facts and opposes you in a nasty, callous way. It makes you mad. It makes you hair-trigger. It makes you block people.

Don’t. I’m not going to tell you to forgive them, because I am not qualified. I am still trying to figure out the magic of forgiveness. I see its wondrous effects, but I am not perfect at granting it. Instead, do whatever calms you down, even if this involves leaving the computer for awhile. Consider what the person is saying. Could any part of it be right? Is there even a toehold of common ground? Can it be used to build some sort of basis for fruitful agreement, or at worst, agreement to disagree?

Don’t be afraid to answer no to all of those questions. Only be afraid not to ask them.

This analysis has saved me from excluding people who make me examine myself and my positions, which is infinitely more useful than surrounding myself with a bunch of cyber-yes-people. I draw the line at personal attack (although it may take more than one) or savaging of family or friends; that’s a ticket out. Yes, I blocked some people during the 2012 presidential election. It wasn’t their ridiculous hate-Obama-no-matter-what persistence or their fucked-up-crazy U.N.-takeover swill that prompted me. They just got boring. That, and it became hard to listen to people I considered friends working so hard at…well, not listening.

Other than that, you have to really sin hard on my page to be blocked. And that’s the way it should be. A wise man — many wise people — have said that it’s hard to hate close-up. That’s a little more hopeful message than the old “keep friends close, enemies closer.” It recognizes that in most cases, despite virulent disagreement on one or even a bundle of issues, almost all of us can find something in common. That, and not exclusion, is what we need to build on.♦

© 2013 Adam Barr

Tagged , , , ,

5 thoughts on “Who To Block, and Whether, and When

  1. Jim Elliott says:

    Good comments, Alex. Such vile comments make it hard to not take them personally. But I can take a more objective perspective and see the value in the fact that you really get to know the full mix of what people are thinking and feeling. Today’s PC culture often sends people underground with their views, leaving us with a false sense of homogeneity of thought. This brings out the thought and emotion and you know what is out there. But I understand how it would be personal, especially if it feels threatening – that type of comment might be worthy of blocking.

  2. George Beatty says:

    Relationships that demand total agreement are not worth the trouble it takes to maintain them.

  3. k8efitz says:

    Well said, AB. All I can tell you is when there are major issues at hand – I just as soon only talk about it with my friends and people whom I know I can have an adult conversation with about it. If there is one thing I remind myself of on a daily basis it’s that a LOT of people are very uneducated and don’t take the time to learn about the policies or information before they speak. It always helps me when someone comments on something I do or say especially when they have no idea what I’m talking about, have not been in my shoes, and certainly haven’t educated themselves enough to know the difference between a well formulated opinion and that which is simply a dissenting statement. …….(off my soap box) 🙂

  4. I only block people who use poor grammar, punctuation, spelling and construction on purpose. I don’t mind the occasional mistake — I make plenty — and I’ll allow for careless typing and the maddening use of ALL CAPS or no caps, but if your poor writing is intentional, you shall be deep-sixed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: